Skip to main content
UCAIug
Login | Join | Help (new window)

Modify settings and columns

UCAIug > Meetings > UCAIug 2011 Summit > UCAIug Summit Evaluation  

UCAIug Summit Evaluation

A survey to get your feedback on the 2011 UCAIug Summit. One response per site account is allowed.
  
View: 

1. Please rate the value of these aspects of the conference to your needs.

  
Low
Average
High
(%)0275518
CIM University
   
 
 
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)00991
OpenSG Boot Camp
     
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)001882
IEC 61850 Tutorial
     
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)096427
Project Presentations
   
 
 
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)027964
Smart Grid Panel
   
 
 
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)093655
Working Group Breakout Tracks
   
 
 
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)018739
Vendor Hospitality Event
   
 
 
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)0275518
User Group Presentations
   
 
 
 
 
 
123Not Applicable

Total: 11

2. Please rate your experience for the following aspects of the conference.

  
Below Average
Average
Above Average
(%)1845360
Pre-Conference Information
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 123Not Applicable
(%)927640
Hotel Facilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 123Not Applicable
(%)045550
Meeting Rooms
   
 
 
 
  
 123Not Applicable
(%)973180
Meeting Meals
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
123Not Applicable

Total: 11

3. How important are the following UCAIug websites to you?

  
Not Important
Fairly Important
Very Important
(%)918279360
UCAIug
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345Don't Know
(%)00018820
CIMug
       
 
 
 
  
 12345Don't Know
(%)02755099
OpenSG
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 12345Don't Know
(%)09559189
IEC 61850
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345Don't Know

Total: 11

4. Will your active participation in any of the user groups represented at the 2011 UCAIug Summit increase in 2011?

 Yes
 (55%) 
 
 No
 (18%) 
 
 Not Sure
 (27%) 
 

Total: 11

5. What suggestions do you have to make this conference more valuable to you and your company?

 
Vendor demo site was a bit to small.  
 (13%) 
 
 
Pre-load the presentations in the morning onto UCAIG website if possible, so they can be downloaded by delegates. This is more useful to me as following the presentation webcast means that I can not dwell on the detail of a slide before the presenter moves on. Even better, present delegates with a memory stick loaded with all the presentations so these can be more easily shared with colleagues back home.
If an abstract of each presentation across all streams was available, it would be very helpful to deciding upon which groups to drop in on. I feel that I may have missed out on relevant work presented in other streams because I was not familiar with their topics and not able to see in advance what they would be presenting.
 (13%) 
 
 
More capability to get feedback.
 (13%) 
 
 
The different track had to much overlap. I wanted to be in two tracks at the same time. Hard to chose were my time would be best spent.

Need to interlace the programs smarter.
 (13%) 
 
 
This time were three tracks in paralell. Suggest to planned joint tracks on common topics, e.g. CIM-61850 and CIM-MultiSpeak etc.
 (13%) 
 
 
Make a meeting also in Latin America
 (13%) 
 
 
As a utility representative not currently involved deeply in this subject matter I would like to see more focus on education and use.  The groups today are working hard to continue defining/refining standards but I would like to learn how to make use of this work.  This can be accomplished more on the web site by exposing more to the public.  For example just learned about and have lots of interest in 61850 work.  I didn't know it existed or it's purpose based on my review of the web site since very little information is posted.  The web site could be more useful to me than a conference.
 (13%) 
 
 
Birds of a Feather Sessions
Brown Bag Lunches
 (13%) 
 

Total: 8

6. What do you like best about the user group whose presentations you attended?

 
It was good to hear how others were working with CIM
 (14%) 
 
 
Great coverage of 61860 by Ralph.
 (14%) 
 
 
There's a wealth of experience and opportunity to learn from others.
 (14%) 
 
 
Utility experience presentations.
 (14%) 
 
 
Presentations from real projects very interesting.
Presentations on conceptual level often sucks.
 (14%) 
 
 
projects examples, experience
 (14%) 
 
 
Examples
Lessons Learned
 (14%) 
 

Total: 7

7. What theme(s) would you like future meetings to cover?

 
Enterprise architectures supporting model driven information integration. This could cover issues such as enterprise service buses to various cloud based configurations.
 (33%) 
 
 
More breakouts.
 (33%) 
 
 
Information. Management common issues.
 (33%) 
 

Total: 3

8. Would you prefer to have the next meeting to be:

 Combined
 (60%) 
 
 Individual user group meetings
 (10%) 
 
 Maybe alternating between individual and combined
 (10%) 
 
 COmbined but less pararrell
 (10%) 
 
 See comment above
 (10%) 
 

Total: 10